Royal Dux

royal dux
History
Fakes, Forgeries and guidelines
1890 - 1912 Marks
1898 - 1918 Marks
1918 - Present Marks and Dates
Royal Dux Modeller's
Facts and Information
Facts and Information cont.
Elly Strobachova - Konigova
Guestbook
Your Photo Gallery
You Articles

Facts and Information cont.

Custom Search

Below - Both piece's are from the mould 1750, these piece's were probably made at different dates between 1905 - 1918 which one came first i'm not sure. Initially it was thought the raised triangle with DPM in the corners was dated after 1918, however recently I have proved that the raised triangle (with DPM) dates much earlier from 1898.

1905-1918
acornproof.jpg
click to enlarge

1905-1918
dux.jpg
click to enlarge

 
 
 
Consider the next two piece's Right - This piece modelled by Hampel mould number 1119 which dates 1904 - 1918. The original mould of this piece dates between 1904 - 1905.

 
 
 
 
Right - This piece made out of the same mould as above but is mould number 9254. This piece has a different mould number because it is not made of porcelain but by a cheaper material(pottery). A document survived from the factory which states that mould number 10000 is dated 16/03/1906. So that dates the piece before 1906 which coincides with the date for the above piece, these piece's made out of the cheaper material rarely have the royal dux triangle. The earliest piece I have made out of the cheaper material as the mould number 8723. If anybody as came across any piece's with a mould number less I would like to hear from you.

4db91.jpg

233e3.jpg
click to enlarge


1905-1918 mould 1750
acornproofmark.jpg
click to enlarge

1905-1918
1750.jpg
click to enlarge

Modelled by Hampel
royaldux1.jpg
Click to Enlarge

Same piece made from a cheaper material
573e3.jpg
Click to Enlarge

4e9e1.jpg

 
 
Later piece

35003.jpg
click to enlarge


-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Mould 1119
royaldux11.jpg
Click to Enlarge

Mould 9254
65eb3.jpg
Claick to enlarge

 
 
 
 
 
 
Left - Both of these piece's date 1905 and 1918 however the first piece dates earlier, to distinguish between the two we can look at the raised lozenge if it has a indentation line  around the edge it suggests the piece is earlier if it does not have the line it suggests the piece was produced later. The first piece also has Hampel signature and the second piece does not. Do not take it for granted that when a piece is signed that it dates earlier or is from the original mould. I have seen reproduced piece's which have a signature. Also we can tell by the glazes used.


To contact me email me at this address taffyboy@royaldux.co.uk